Fundamental
of
Vipassana
Mahasi
Sayadaw
translated by Maung
Tha Noe
Calm and Insight
What do we meditate on? How do we
develop
insight? This is a very important question.
There are two kinds of meditation:
meditating to develop calm and meditating to develop insight.
Meditating
on the ten devices only gives rise to calm, not insight.
Meditating on the
ten foul things (a swollen corpse, for example), too, only gives
rise to
calm, not insight. The ten recollections, like remembering the
Buddha, the
Law and others, too, can develop calm and not insight. Meditating
on the
thirty-two parts of the body like hair, nails, teeth, skin --
these too,
are not insight. They develop only concentration.
Mindfulness as to respiration is
also
concentration-developing. But one can develop insight from it.
Visuddhi-Magga, however, includes it in the concentration
subjects and
so we will call it as such here.
Then there are the four divine
states,
love, pity, sympathetic joy, and equanimity, and four formless
states
leading to formless jhanas. Then, there is the meditation
on the
loathsomeness of food. All these are subjects for concentration
meditation.
When you meditate on the four
elements
inside your body, it is called the analysis of the four elements.
Although
this is a concentration meditation, it helps develop insight as
well.
All these forty subjects of
meditation are
subjects for developing concentration. Only respiration and
analysis of
elements have to do with insight. The others will not give rise to
insight. If you want insight, you will have to work further.
To come back to our question, how
do we
develop insight? The answer is: we develop insight by meditating
on the
five aggregates of grasping. The mental and material qualities
inside
beings are aggregates of grasping. They may be grasped with
delight by
craving in which case it is called "grasping of the sense objects"
-- or
they may be grasped wrongly by wrong views -- in which case it is
called
"grasping through wrong views." You have to meditate on them and
see them
as they really are. If you don't, you will grasp them with craving
and
wrong views. Once you see them as they are, you no longer grasp
them. In
this way you develop insight. We will discuss the five aggregates
of
grasping in detail.
The five aggregates of grasping
are matter
or form, feelings, perception, volitional activities and
consciousness.
What are they? They are the things you experience all the time.
You do not
have to go anywhere else to find them. They are in you. When you
see, they
are there in the seeing. When you hear, they are there in the
hearing.
When you smell, taste, touch, or think, they are there in the
smelling,
tasting, touching or thinking. When you bend, stretch or move your
limbs,
the aggregates are there in the bending, stretching or moving.
Only you do
not know them to be aggregates. It is because you have not
meditated on
them and so do not know them as they really are. Not knowing them
as they
are, you grasp them with craving and wrong view.
What happens when you bend? It
begins with
the intention to bend. Then come the forms of bending one by one.
Now in
the intention to bend there are the four mental aggregates. The
mind that
intends to bend is the cons-ciousness. When you think of bending
and then
bend, you may feel happy, or unhappy, or neither happy nor
unhappy, doing
so. If you bend with happiness, there is pleasant feeling. If you
bend
with unhappiness or anger, there is unpleasant feeling. If you
bend with
neither happiness nor unhappiness, there is neutral feeling. So,
when you
think of bending, there is the "feeling" aggregate. Then, there is
perception, the aggregate that recognizes the bending. Then there
is the
mental state that urges you to bend. It seems as though it were
saying
"Bend! Bend!" It is the volitional activities. Thus, in the
intention to
bend you have feelings, perception, volitional activities and
consciousness -- all four mental aggregates. The movement of
bending is
matter or form. It is the material aggregate. So, the intention to
bend
and the bending together make up the five aggregates.
Thus, in one bending of the arm,
there are
the five aggregates. You move once and the five aggregates come
up. You
move again and there are more of the five aggregates. Every move
calls up
the five aggregates. If you have not meditated on them rightly and
have
not known them rightly, what happens we need not tell you. You
know for
yourselves.
Well, you think "I intend to bend"
and "I
bend", don't you? Everybody does. Ask the children, they will give
the
same answer. Ask adults who can't read and write, the same answer.
Ask
someone who can read, the same answer still if he will say what he
has in
his mind. But, because he is well-read, he may invent answers to
suit the
scriptures and say "Mind and matter." It is not what he knows for
himself.
Only inventions to suit the scriptures. In his heart of hearts he
is
thinking: "It is I who intend to bend. It is I who bend. It is I
who
intend to move. It is I who move." He also thinks: "This I have
been
before, am now, and will be in the future. I exist for ever." This
thinking is called the notion of permanence. Nobody thinks, "This
intention to bend exists only now." Ordinary people always think,
"This
mind existed before. The same that have existed before am now
thinking of
bending." They also think, "This thinking I exist now and will go
on
existing."
When you bend or move the limbs,
you
think: "It is the same limbs that have existed that are moving
now. It
is the same I that have existed that am moving now." After
moving you
again think, "These limbs, this I, always exist." It never occurs
to you
that they pass away. This, too, is the notion of permanence. It is
clinging to what is impermanent as permanent, clinging to what is
no
personality, no ego, as personality, as ego.
Then, as you have bent or
stretched to
your desire, you think it is very nice. For example, as you feel
stiffness
in the arm, you move or rearrange it and the stiffness is gone.
You feel
comfortable. You think it is very nice. You think it is happiness.
Dancers
and amateur dancers bend and stretch as they dance and think it is
very
nice to do so. They delight in it and are pleased with themselves.
When
you converse among yourselves you often shake your hands and heads
and are
pleased. You think it is happiness. When something you are doing
meets
with success, again you think it is good, it is happiness. This is
how you
delight through craving and cling to things. What is impermanent
you take
to be permanent and delight in. What is not happiness, not
personality,
but just aggregates of mind and matter, you take to be happiness,
or
personality, and delight in. You delight in them and cling to
them. You
mistake them for self or ego and cling to them, too.
So, when you bend, stretch or move
your
limbs, the thinking "I will bend" is aggregate of grasping. The
bending is
the aggregate of grasping. The thinking "I will stretch" is the
aggregate
of grasping. The stretching is the aggregate of grasping. The
thinking "I
will move" is the aggregate of grasping. The moving is the
aggregate of
grasping. When we speak of aggregates of grasping to be meditated
on, we
mean just these things.
The same thing happens in seeing,
hearing,
etc. When you see, the seat of seeing, the eye, is manifest. So is
the
object seen. Both are material things. They cannot cognize. But if
one
fails to meditate while seeing, one grasps them. One thinks the
whole body
with the eye is permanent, happy, self, and grasps it. One thinks
the
whole material world with the object seen is permanent, beautiful,
good,
happy, and. self, and grasps it. So the form eye and the form
visible
object are aggregates of grasping.
And when you see, the "seeing" is
manifest, too. It is the four mental aggregates. The mere
awareness of
seeing is the aggregate consciousness. Pleasure or displeasure at
seeing
is the aggregate feeling. What perceives the object seen is the
aggregate
perception. What brings the attention to see is the aggregate
volitional
activities. They constitute the four mental aggregates. If one
fails to
meditate while seeing, one is inclined to think that seeing "has
existed
before, and exists now." Or, as one sees good things, one
may think
"seeing is good." So thinking, one goes after good and strange
things to
enjoy seeing. One goes to watch plays and films at the expense of
money,
sleep and health because one thinks it is good to do so. If one
does not
think it is good, one will not go to waste money or impair one's
health.
To think that what sees or enjoys is "I", "I am enjoying", is to
grasp
with craving and wrong view. Because they grasp, the mind and
matter that
manifest themselves in seeing are said to be aggregates of
grasping.
You grasp in the same way in
hearing,
smelling, tasting, touching or thinking. You grasp all the more to
the
mind that thinks, imagines and reflects as being the "I", the ego.
So, the
five aggregates of grasping are none other than the
mental-material things
that manifest themselves at the six doors whenever one sees,
hears, feels
or perceives. You must try to see these aggregates as they are. To
meditate on them and see them as they are -- that is insight
knowledge.
"Insight meditation is meditating
on the
five aggregates of grasping." This is in accordance with the
teachings of
the Buddha. The teachings of the Buddha are called suttas, which
means "thread." When a carpenter is about to plane down or saw off
a piece
of timber he draws a straight line using a thread. In the same way
when we
want to live the holy life we use the "thread" or sutta to
draw straight lines in our actions. The Buddha has given us lines
or
instructions on how to train in morality, develop concentration
and make
become wisdom. You cannot go out of the line and speak or act as
you
please. Regarding the meditation of the five aggregates, here are a
few
excerpts from the suttas:
"Material shape, monks, is
impermanent.
What is impermanent, that is suffering. What is suffering, that is
not the
self. What is not self, that is not mine, that am I not, this is
not my
self. As it really comes to be, one should discern it thus by
right
wisdom." -- Samyutta Nikaya
ii 19
You must meditate so that you will
realize
this impermanent, suffering, not-self material form is really
impermanent,
dreadfully suffering, and without a self or ego. You should
meditate
likewise on feelings, perception, activities, and consciousness.
What is the use of looking upon
these aggregates as impermanent, suffering and not-self?
The Buddha tells us:
"So seeing all these
things, the
instructed disciple of the Aryans disregards material shape,
disregards
feeling." -- Samyutta
Nikaya iii
68
He who realizes the impermanent,
suffering, not-self nature of the five aggregates is wearied of
material
form as he is of feelings, perception, activities and
consciousness.
"By disregarding he is
passionless."
That is to say, he has reached the
Ariyan
Path.
"Through passionlessness, he is
freed."
Once he has reached the Ariyan
path of
passionlessness, he has arrived at the four fruitions of freedom
from the
defilements, too.
"In freedom the knowledge comes to
be 'I
am freed.' "
When you are freed, you know for
yourself
that you are so. In other words, when you have become an
arahat in
whom the defilements are extinguished, you know you have become
one.
All these excerpts are from Yad
anicca
Sutta and there are numerous suttas of this kind.
The whole
Khandhavagga Samyutta is a collection of them. Two suttas
are
especially noteworthy: Silavanta Sutta and Sutavanta
Sutta.
In both suttas the venerable Maha Kotthika puts some questions to
the
venerable Sariputta, who gives very brief but vivid answers. Maha
Kotthika
asks:
"What things, friend Sariputta,
should be
attended to thoroughly by a monk of moral habit?"
Note the attribute "of moral
habit" in
this question. If you want to practise insight meditation with a
view to
attaining the Path and Fruition and Nirvana, the least
qualification you
need is to be of moral habit. If you don 't even have moral habit,
you
can't hope for the higher conditions of concentration and wisdom.
The
Venerable. Sariputta answers:
"The five grasping aggregates,
friend
Kotthika, are the things which should be thoroughly attended to by
a monk
of moral habit, as being impermanent, suffering, as a disease, as a
boil,
as a dart, as pain, as illness, as alien, as decay, as void, as
not-self."
What is the good of meditating
like that?
In answer the Venerable Sariputta goes on,
"Indeed, friend, it is
possible for a monk
of moral habit so thoroughly attending to these five aggregates of
grasping" to realize the
fruits of
stream-winning.
So, if you want to be a stream
winner and never to be reborn in the four lower states, you have
to
meditate on the five aggregates to realize their impermanence,
suffering,
and not-self nature. But that is not all. You can become an
Arahat, too.
The venerable Kotthika goes on to ask,
"What things, friend Sariputta,
should be
attended to thoroughly by a monk who is a Stream-winner?"
The Venerable Sariputta answers
that it is
the same five aggregates of grasping that should be thoroughly
attended to
by a stream-winner, as impermanent, suffering, not-self. The
result? He
moves on to Once-returning. What does Once-returner meditate on?
Again the
same five aggregates of grasping. He then becomes a Non-returner.
What
does the Non-returner meditate on? The five aggregates again. Now
he
becomes an Arahat. What does the Arahat meditate on? The five
aggregates
again. From this it is clear that the five aggregates are the
things one
has to meditate on even when one has become an Arahat.
What good is it to the Arahat by
meditating so? Will he become a silent Buddha? Or, a supreme
Buddha? No,
neither. He will end his round of rebirths as an Arahat and enter
Nirvana.
The Arahat has no defilement left unremoved or uncalmed yet. All
the
defilements have been removed and calmed. So, he has nothing to
develop in
order to remove the defilements left unremoved or to calm those
left
uncalmed. Neither has he any moral habit, con-centration or wisdom
yet to
perfect. All the moral habits, concentration and wisdom that ought
to be
perfected have been perfected in him. So, he has no need to work
for the
perfection of what ought to be perfected, nor has he any need to
increase
those already perfected. The insight practice brings no such
benefits to
the Arahat.
One of the benefits the Arahat
receives by
meditating on the five aggregates is the happy condition in this
world.
Notwithstanding his being an Arahat, if he remains without
meditation,
disquiet and discomfort keep coming up at the six sense-doors, now
here,
now there. Here, disquiet does not mean mental distress. As the
sense-objects keep coming up despite himself, he finds no peace of
mind.
That is all. Not to speak of Arahats, our meditators of today feel
ill at
ease to meet with the sense-objects, eager though they are on
insight. As
they return home from the meditation centre, they see this thing,
hear
that thing, get engaged in such and such business talks, and there
is no
peace at all. So they come back to the centre. To some, however,
the
disquiet does not last very long. Just four, five or ten days.
Very soon
the homely spirit gets the better of them and they are happy with
their
home life and set to household cares again. The arahat never
returns to
his old habits. If he meets with various sense-objects without
meditation,
only disquiet results. Only when he is absorbed in insight
meditation does
he find peace of mind. Thus meditating on the five grasping
aggregates
brings to the Arahat a happy condition in this world.
Again, as he lives in earnest
meditation,
mindfulness and comprehension of the impermanence, suffering and
not-self
keep rising in him. This is another benefit. The Arahat in whom
mindfulness and comprehension keep rising is said to be in a
chronic state
of life. Such a one can enjoy the attainment to fruition at
any
time and for as long as he desires. For these two benefits -- a
happy
condition in this world and mindfulness-comprehension -- the
Arahat lives
in meditation.
The above are the answers given by
the
venerable Sariputta in Silavanta Sutta. The same answers
are found
in Sutavanta Sutta too. The only difference is in the terms
silavanta, "of moral habit" or "virtuous", and sutavanta,
"instructed" or "well informed." All the other words are the same.
Based
on these two suttas and other suttas on the aggregate the dictum
has been
formulated: Insight
knowledge comes
from meditating on the five aggregates of grasping.
Now to come back to the grasping
that
rises through the six sense-doors.
When people see, they think of
themselves
or others as being permanent, as having existed before, as
existing now,
as going to exist in future, as existing always. They think of
them as
being happy, good, or beautiful. They think of them as being
living
entities. They think likewise when they hear, smell, taste or
touch. This
"touch" is widespread all over the body -- wherever there is flesh
and
blood.
And wherever touch arises, there
arises
grasping. The bending, stretching, or moving of the limbs
mentioned
earlier are all instances of touch. So are the tense movements of
rising
and falling in the abdomen. We will come to this in detail later.
When one thinks or imagines, one
thinks,
"The I that have existed before is now thinking. Thinking, I go on
existing," and so one thinks of oneself as being permanent, as an
ego. One
also thinks the thinking or imagining as being enjoyable, as being
very
nice. One thinks it is happiness.
If told that the thinking will
disappear,
he cannot accept it. He is not pleased. This is because he is
clinging to
it.
In this way one clings to whatever
comes
through the six sense doors, as being permanent, as being happy,
as ego,
as self. One delights with craving and clings to it. One mistakes
with
wrong view and clings to it.
You have to meditate on the five
aggregates that can cling or grasp.
When you meditate, you have to
meditate
with method. Only the right method can bring about insight. If you
look
upon things as being permanent, how can there be insight?
If you
look upon them as being happy, beautiful, as soul, as ego,
how can
there be insight?
Mind and matter are impermanent
things.
These impermanent things you have to meditate on to see them as
they
really are, as being impermanent. They rise and pass away and keep
on
oppressing you, so they are dreadful, they are sufferings. You
have to
meditate to see them as they are, as sufferings. They are
processes
lacking in a personality, a soul, a self. You have to meditate to
see that
there is no personality, no soul, no self. You must try to see
them as
they really are.
So, every time you see, hear,
touch or
perceive, you must try to see the mental and material processes
that rise
through the six sense doors as they really are. When you see, the
seeing is real. This you must note seeing, seeing. In the
same way
when you hear, note hearing. When you smell, note smelling.
When you taste, note tasting. When you touch, note touching.
Tiredness, hotness, aches, and such unbearable and unpleasant
sensations
arise from contact too. Observe them: tiredness, hot, pain, and
so
on. Thoughts, ideas, may also turn up. Note them: thinking,
imagining,
pleasure, delight, as they arise.
But to the novice it is hard to
observe
all that come up through the six sense doors. He must begin with
just a
few.
You meditate like this. When you
breathe
in and out, the way the abdomen moves rising and falling is
especially
conspicuous. You begin observing this move-ment. The movement of
rising
you observe as rising. The movement of falling you observe
as
falling. This observation of rising and falling is void of the
lingo
of the scriptures. People who are not used to meditational
practice speak
of it in contempt: "This rising and falling business has nothing
to do
with the scriptures. It is nothing." Well may they think it is
nothing
because it is not done up in scriptural jargon.
Theoretically, however, it is
something. The rising is real, the falling is real, the moving air
element
is real. We have used the colloquial words rising and
falling
for convenience's sake. In scriptural terminology, the
rising-falling
is the air-element. If you observe the abdomen attentively as it
rises and
falls, the firmness is there, the motion is there, the bringing
out is
there. Here, the "firmness" is the characteristic of the
air-element, the
motion is its property, and the bringing out is its manifestation.
To know
the air-element as it really is means to know its characteristic,
property
and manifes-tation. We meditate to know them. Insight begins with
the
determination of mind and matter. To achieve this the meditator
begins
with the matter. How?
"(The meditator) should.... seize
by way
of characteristic, function and so on." -- Visuddhi-magga ii 227
When you begin meditating on
matter or
mind, you should do so by way of either the characteristic or the
property
(function). "And so on" refers to the manifesta-tion (mode of
appearance).
In this connection the Compendium of Philosophy is quite to the
point.
"Purity of view is the
understanding of
mind and matter with respect to their characteristics, function
(property), mode of appearance (manifestation) and proximate
cause."
The meaning is this: insight
begins with
the analytical knowledge of mind and matter. In the seven
purities, first
you perfect the purity of morals and the purity of mind, and then
you
begin the purity of views. To achieve the analytical knowledge of
mind and
matter and the purity of views, you have to meditate on mind and
matter
and know them by way of their characteristics, property
(function),
manifestation and proximate cause. Once you know them thus, you
gain the
analytical knowledge of mind and matter. Once this knowledge grows
sharper, you develop the purity of views.
Here, "to know them by way of
their
characteristics" means to know the intrinsic nature of mind and
matter. To
know "by way of property" is to know their function. Manifestation
is
their mode of appearance. It is not yet necessary to know the
proximate
cause at the initial stage of meditational practice. So we will
just go on
to explain the characteristics, function and manifestation.
In both the Path of Purity and
the
Compendium of Philosophy just quoted it is not indicated
that mind
and matter should be meditated on by name, by number, as material
particles or as incessantly coming up processes. It is only shown
that
they should be meditated on by way of their characteristics,
function and
manifestation. One should take careful note of this. If not, one
can be
led to concepts of names, numbers, particles or processes. The
commentaries say that you should meditate on mind and matter by
way of
their characteristic, function and manifestation, and so when you
meditate
on the air element, you do so by way of its characteristic,
function and
manifestation. What is the characteristic of the air-element?
It is
the characteristic of support. This is its intrinsic nature. It is
the air
element itself. What is the function of the air-element? It is
moving.
What is its manifestation? It is bringing out. Manifestation is
what
appears to the meditator's intellect. As one meditates on the
air-element,
it appears to the meditator's intellect as something bringing out,
pushing, and pulling. This is the manifestation of the
air-element. As
you meditate on the rising-falling of the abdomen, all the
firmness,
moving, bringing out, become clear to you. These are the
characteristic,
function and manifestation of the air-element. This air element is
important. In the postures and comprehension, contemplation of the
body,
Satipatthana-sutta, the commentator has laid
emphasis on the
air-element. Here is the Buddha's teaching:
"Gacchanto va gacchami ti
pajanati."
(When he walks, he is aware "I am walking.")
The Buddha is instructing us to be
mindful
of the form walking by noting walking, walking, every time
we walk.
How knowledge is developed from
meditating
thus is explained by the commentator:
"The thought I am walking arises.
This
produces air. The air produces the intimation. The bringing
forward of the
whole body as the air-element spreads is said to be walking."
The meaning is this: The meditator
who is
used to meditating -- walking, walking, every time he walks
realizes like this. First the idea "I will walk" arises. This
intention
gives rise to tense movement all over the body, which in turn
causes the
material body to move forward move by move. This we say "I walk,"
or "He
walks." In reality there is no I or He that walks. Only the
intention to
walk and the form walking. This the meditator realizes. Here, in
this
explanation of the Commentary, the emphasis is on the realization
of the
moving of the air-element. So, if you understand the air-element
by way of
its characteristics, function and manifestation, you can decide
for
yourself whether your meditation is right or not.
The air-element has the
characteristic of
support. In a football it is air that fills and supports so that
the ball
expands and remains firm. In colloquial speech we say the ball is
full and
firm. In philosophical terms the air-element is in support. When
you
stretch your arm you feel some stiffness there. It is the
air-element in
support. In the same way when you press an air-pillow or mattress
with
your body or head, your body or head will not come down but stay
high
above. It is because the air clement in the pillow or mattress is
supporting you. Bricks pile up as the ones below support those
above. If
the bricks below are not supporting, the ones above will tumble
down. In
the same way the human body is full of the air-element which gives
support
to it so that it can stand stiff and firm. We say "firm"
relatively. If
there is something firmer, we will call it "lax". If there is
something
more lax, it becomes firm again.
The function of the air-element is
moving.
It moves from place to place when it is strong. It is the
air-element that
makes the body bend, stretch, sit, rise, go or come. Those
unpractised in
insight meditation often say, "If you note bending, stretching,
only concepts like arms will appear to you. If you note left,
right, only concepts like legs will appear to you. If you note
rising, falling, only concepts like the abdomen will appear to
you."
This may be true to some of the beginners. But it is not true to
think
that the concepts will keep coming up. Both concepts and realities
appear
to the beginner. Some people instruct the beginners to meditate on
realities only. This is impossible. To forget concepts is quite
impracticable at the beginning. You must combine concepts with
realities.
The Buddha himself used concepts and told us to be "aware 'I am
walking' "
when we walk, bend or stretch. He did not use realities and tell
us to be
"aware 'It is supporting, moving'," etc. Although you meditate
using the
language of concepts like "walking, bending, stretching," as your
mindfulness and concentration grow stronger, all the concepts
disappear
and only the realities like support and moving appear to you. When
you
reach the stage of the knowledge of dissolution, although you
meditate
walking, walking, neither the legs nor the body appear
to you.
Only the movement itself is there. Although you meditate bending,
bending, there will not be any arms or legs. Only the
movement.
Although you meditate rising, falling, there will be no
image of
the abdomen or the body. Only the movement out and in. These as
well as
swaying are functions of the air-element.
What appears to be bringing out or
drawing
in to the meditator's mind is the manifestation of the
air-element. When
you bend or stretch your arm, it appears, something is drawing it
in or
pushing it out. It is plainer when walking. To the meditator whose
concentration is grown sharper, by noting walking, right step,
left
step, lifting, putting forward, putting down, this moving
forward
as if being driven from behind becomes quite plain. The legs seem
to be
pushing forward of their own accord. How they move forward without
the
meditator making any effort is very plain. It is so good walking
noting
like this that some spend a lot of time in it.
So, when you meditate on the air
element,
you should know it by way of its characteristic of supporting, its
function of moving, and its manifestation of bringing out. Only
then is
your knowledge right and as it should be.
You may ask, "Are we to meditate
only
after learning the characteristic, function and manifestation?"
No. You
need not learn them. If you meditate on the rising
mind-and-matter, you
know the characteristic, the function, and the manifestation as
well.
There is no other way than knowing by way of the characteristic,
function,
and manifestation when you meditate on the rising mind-and-matter.
When
you look up to the sky on a rainy day you see a flash of
lightning. This
bright light is the characteristic of the lightning. As lightning
flashes,
darkness is dispelled. This dispelling of darkness is the
functions of
lightning, its work. You also see what it is like -- whether it is
long,
short, a curve, a circle, straight, or vast. You see its
characteristic,
its function, its manifesta-tion, all at once. Only you may not be
able to
say the brightness is its characteristic, dispelling of darkness
is its
function, or its shape or outline is its manifestation. But you
see them
all the same.
In the same way, when you meditate
on the
rising mind-and-matter, you know its characteristic, its function,
its
manifestation, everything. You need not learn them. Some learned
persons
think that you have to learn them before you meditate. Not so.
What you
learn are only concepts. Not realities. The meditator who is
contemplating
the rising mind-and-matter knows them as if he were touching them
with his
own hand. He needs not learn about them. If there is the elephant
before
your very eyes, you need not look at the picture of an elephant.
The meditator who is meditating on
the
rising and falling of the abdomen knows the firmness or laxity
thereof --
its characteristic. He knows the moving in or out -- its function.
He also
knows its bringing in and pushing out --its manifestation. If he
knows
these things as they really are, does he need to learn about them?
Not if
he wants the realization for himself. But if he wants to preach to
others,
he will need to learn about them. When you meditate right step,
left
step, you know the tenseness in every step -- its
characteristic. You
know the moving about-- its function. And you know its bringing
out -- its
manifestation. This is proper knowledge, the right knowledge.
Now, to know for yourselves how
one can
discern the characteristic and so on by just meditating on what
rises, try
doing some meditation. You certainly have some hotness, pain,
tiredness,
ache, somewhere in your body now. These are unpleasant feelings
hard to
bear. Concentrate on this unpleasantness with your intellect
and
note hot, hot, or pain, pain. You will find that
you
are going through an unpleasant experience and suffering. This is
the
characteristic of suffering -- going through an unplea-sant
experience.
When this unpleasant feeling comes
about,
you become low-spirited. If the unpleasantness is little, there is
a
little low-spiritedness. If it is great, then low-spiritedness is
great
too. Even those who are of a strong will have their spirits go low
if the
unpleasant feelings are intense. Once you are very tired, you
can't even
move. This making the spirit go low is the function of unpleasant
feeling.
We have said "spirit"-- the mind. When the mind is low, its
concomitants
get low too.
The manifestation of unpleasant
feeling is
physical oppression. It manifests itself as a physical affliction,
something unbearable to the meditator's intellect. As he meditates
hot,
hot, pain, pain, it comes up to him as something oppressing in
the
body, something very hard to bear. It shows up so much that you
have to
groan. If you meditate on the unpleasant feeling in your body as
it rises,
you know the undergoing of undesirable tangible object its
characteristic,
the waning of associated states -- its function, and the physical
affliction -- its manifestation. This is the way the meditators
gain
knowledge.
You can meditate on mind, too.
Mind
cognizes and thinks. So what thinks and imagines is mind. Meditate
on this
mind as thinking, imagining, pondering, whenever it arises.
You
will find that it has the intrinsic nature of going to the object,
cognizing the object. This is the characteristic of mind, as it is
said,
"Mind has the characteristic of cognizing." Every kind of mind
cognizes.
The conscious-ness of seeing cognizes the object, as do the
consciousness
of hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, and thinking.
When you work in collective, you
have a
leader. Consciousness is the leader that cognizes the object that
appears
at any sense door. When the visible object comes up to the
eye,
consciousness cognizes it first of all. It is then followed by
feeling,
perception, desire, delight, dislike, admiration and so on. In the
same
way, when the audible object comes up to the ear, it is
consciousness that
cognizes it first. It is more obvious when you think or imagine.
If an
idea comes up while you are meditating "rising", "falling"
etc, you
have to note the idea. If you can note it the moment it appears,
it
disappears immediately. If you can't, several of its followers
like
delight, desire, will come in succession. Then the meditator
realizes how
consciousness is the leader -- its function.
"Mind precedes things."
--Dhammapada
If you note consciousness whenever
it
rises, you see very clearly how it is acting as leader, now going
to this
object now going to that object.
Again it is said in the
commentary:
"Consciousness has the manifestation of continuity." As you
meditate
rising, falling, etc., the mind sometimes wanders away. You
note it
and it disappears. Then another consciousness comes up. You note
it and it
disappears. Again another consciousness appears. Again you note it
and
again it disappears. Again another comes up. You have to note lots
of such
comings up and goings away of consciousness. The meditator comes
to
realize: "Consciousness is a succession of events that come up and
go away
one after another. When one disappears, another appears." Thus you
realize
the continuous manifestation of consciousness. The meditator who
realizes
this also realizes death and birth. "Death is nothing strange
after all.
It is just like the passing away of the consciousness I have been
noting.
To be born again is like the coming up of the consciousness I am
now
noting that has risen in continuation of the one preceding it".
To show that one can understand
the
characteristic, function and manifestation of things even though
one has
not learnt about them, we have taken the air-element out of the
material
qualities and the unpleasant feeling and consciousness out of the
mental
qualities. You just have to meditate on them as they arise. The
same
applies to all the other mental and material qualities. If you
meditate on
them as they arise, you will understand their characteristics,
function
and manifestation. The beginner in meditation can meditate on and
understand the mental-material aggregates of grasping only by way
of these
characteristics, function and manifestation. At the initial stage
with the
analytical knowledge of mind and matter and the knowledge by
discerning
conditionality, which are elemental in insight meditation,
understanding
that much is enough. When you come to real insight knowledges like
the
knowledge of investigation, you know the characteristics,
impermanence,
suffering, and not self as well.
The question now arises: What do
we
meditate on the grasping aggregates for? And, as regards time,
what time
do we meditate on, the past, the future, the present, or
indefinite time?
What do we meditate for? Do we
meditate on
the aggregates of grasping for worldly wealth? For relief from
illness?
For clairvoyance? For levitation and such supernatural powers?
Insight
meditation aims at none of these. There have been cases of people
who get
cured of serious illnesses as a result of meditational practice.
In the
days of the Buddha persons who got perfected through insight
meditation
had supernatural powers. People today may have such powers if they
get
perfected. But fulfilment of these powers is not the basic
aim of
insight meditation.
Shall we meditate on phenomena
past and
gone? Shall we meditate on phenomena not yet come? Shall we
meditate on
the present phenomena? Or, shall we meditate on phenomena which
are
neither past, future, nor present, but which we can imagine as we
have
read about them in books?
The answer to these questions is:
we
meditate to not grasp and we meditate on what is arising.
Yes, people not practised in
meditation
grasp at the rising mind-and-matter every time they see, hear,
touch, or
become aware of. They grasp at them with craving – are pleased
with them.
They grasp at them with wrong views, as permanent, happy, as the
I, the
ego. We meditate in order not to let these graspings arise, to be
free
from them. This is the basic aim of insight meditation.
And we meditate on what is
arising. We do
not meditate on things past, future, or indefinite in time. Here
we are
speaking of practical insight meditation. In inferential
meditation we do
meditate on things past, future, and indefinite in time. Let me
explain.
Insight meditation is of two kinds, practical and inferential. The
knowledge you gain by meditating on what actually arises by way of
characteristic, function and manifestation is practical insight.
From this
practical knowledge you infer the impermanence, suffering and
not-self of
things past and future, things you have not experienced. This is
inferential insight.
"The fixing both (unseen
and seen) as one
by following the object..." --
Patisambhida
The Path of Purity explains this
statement
as follows:
"....by following, going
after the object
seen, visually determining both (the seen and unseen) as one in
intrinsic
nature: 'as this (seen) one, so what goes as complex broke up in
the past
and will break up in the future also'." --
Visuddhi-magga
"The object seen"-- this is
practical
insight. And "going after the object seen ... determining both ...
in the
past ... in the future" -- this is inferential insight. But here
note: the
inferential insight is possible only after the practical. No
inference can
be made without first knowing the present. The same explanation is
given
in the commentary on Kathavatthu.
"Seeing the impermanence
of even one
formation, one draws the conclusion as regards the others, as
'impermanent
are all the things of life'."
Why don't we meditate on things
past or
future? Because they will not make you understand the real nature
and
cleanse you of defilements. You do not remember your past
existences. Even
in this existence, you do not remember most of your childhood. So,
meditating on things past, how can you know things as they really
are with
their characteristics and functions? Things of the more recent
past may be
recalled. But, as you recall them, you think, "I saw, I heard, I
thought.
It was I who saw at that time and it is I who am seeing now."
There is the
"I" notion for you. There can even be notions of permanence and
happiness.
So recalling things past to meditate on do not serve our purpose,
You have
grasped them and this grasping is hard to overcome. Although you
look on
them as mind and matter with all your learning and thinking,
the "I"
notion persists, because you have already grasped it. You say
"impermanent" on the one hand, you get the notion "permanent" on
the
other. You note suffering, but the notion "happiness" keeps
turning
up. You meditate on not-self, but the self notion remains
strong
and firm. You argue with yourself.
In the end your meditation has to
give way
to your preconceived ideas.
The future has not yet come, and
you can't
be sure what exactly it will be like when it comes. You may have
meditated
on them in advance but may fail to do so when they turn up. Then
will
craving, wrong view, and defilements arise all anew. So, to
meditate on
the future with the help of learning and thinking is no way to
know things
as they really are. Nor is it the way to calm defilements.
Things of indefinite time have
never
existed, will not exist, and are not existing, in oneself or in
others.
They are just imagined by learning and thinking. They are
high-sounding
and look intellectual, but on reflection are found to be just
concepts of
names, signs and shapes. Suppose someone is meditating, "Matter is
impermanent. Matter rises moment to moment and passes away moment
to
moment." Ask him: What matter is it? Is it matter of the past or
the
present or the future? Matter in oneself or in others? If in
oneself, is
it matter in the head? The body? The limbs? The eye? The ear? You
will
find that it is none of these but a mere concept, an imagination.
So we do
not meditate on indefinite time.
But the present phenomenon is what
comes
up at the six doors right now. It has not yet been defiled. It is
like an
unsoiled piece of cloth or paper. If you are quick enough to
meditate on
it just as it comes up, it will not be defiled. You fail to note
it and it
gets defiled. Once defiled, it cannot be undefiled. If you fail to
note
the mind-and-matter as it rises, grasping intervenes. There is
grasping
with craving -- grasping of sense-desires. There is grasping with
wrong
view -- grasping of wrong views, of mere rite and ritual, of a
theory of
the self. What if grasping takes place?
"Conditioned by grasping is
becoming;
conditioned by becoming is birth; conditioned by birth, old age
and dying,
grief, suffering, sorrow, despair and lamentation come into being.
Thus
comes to be the origination of this entire mass of ill." --
Majjhima Nikaya i 333; Samyutta
Nikaya ii
1-2.
Grasping is no small matter. It is
the
root-cause of good and bad deeds. One who is grasped works to
accomplish
what he believes are good things. Everyone of us is doing what he
thinks
is good.What makes him think it is good? It is grasping. Others
may think
it is bad, but to the doer it is good. If he thinks it is not
good, of
course he will not do it. There is a noteworthy passage in King
Asoka's
inscriptions: "One thinks well of one's work. One never thinks
evil of
one's work." A thief steals because it is good to him to steal. A
robber
robs people because he thinks it is good to rob. A killer kills
because he
thinks it is good to kill. Ajatasattu killed his own father, King
Bimbisara. He thought it was good. Devadatta conspired against the
life of
the Buddha. Why, to him it was good. One who takes poison to kill
himself
does so because he thinks it is good. Moths rush to a flame
thinking it is
a very nice thing. All living things do what they do
because they
think it is good to do so. To think it is good is grasping. Once
you are
really grasped you do things. What is the outcome? Well, it
is the
good deeds and the bad deeds.
It is a good deed to refrain from
causing
suffering to others. It is a good deed to render help to others.
It is a
good deed to give. It is a good deed to pay respect to those to
whom
respect is due. A good deed can bring about peace, a long life,
and good
health in this very life. It will bring good results in
future
lives, too. Such grasping is good, right grasping. Those who are
thus
grasped do good deeds like giving and keeping precepts and cause
thereby
to bring about good karma. What is the result then? "Conditioned
by
becoming is birth." After death they are born anew. Where are they
born?
In the Good Born, in the worlds of men and gods. As men they are
endowed
with such good things as a long life, beauty, health, as well as
good
birth, good following, and wealth. You can call them "happy
people." As
gods, too, they will be attended by multitudes of gods and
goddesses and
be living in magnificent palaces. They have been grasped by
notions
of happiness and in a worldly sense, they can be said to be happy.
But from the point of view of the
Buddha's
teaching, these happy men and gods are not exempt from
suffering.
"Conditioned by birth are old age and dying." Although born a
happy man,
he will have to grow into an old "happy" man. Look at all those
"happy"
old people in this world. Once over seventy or eighty, not
everything is
all right with them. Grey hair, broken teeth, poor eye-sight, poor
hearing, backs bent double, wrinkles all over, energy all spent
up, mere
good-for-nothings! With all their wealth and big names, these old
men and
women, can they be happy? Then there is the disease of old age.
They
cannot sleep well, they cannot eat well, they have difficulty
sitting down
or getting up. And finally, they must die. Rich man, king, or man
of
power, dies one day. He has nothing to rely on then. Friends and
relatives
there are around him, but just as he is lying there on his
death-bed he
closes his eyes and dies. Dying he goes away all alone to another
existence. He must find it really hard to part with all his
wealth. If he
is not a man of good deeds he will be worried about his future
existence.
The great god, likewise, has to
die. Gods
too are not spared. A week before they die, five signs appear to
them. The
flowers they wear which never faded now begin to fade. Their
dresses which
never got worn-out now appear worn-out. Sweat comes out in their
armpits,
an unusual thing. Their bodies which always looked young now look
old.
Having never felt bored in their divine lives, they now feel
bored. When
these five signs appear, they at once realize their imminent
death, and
are greatly alarmed. In the days of the Buddha, the Sakka, (King
of
the gods) himself had these signs appear to him. Greatly
alarmed that
he was going to die and lose his glory, he came to the Buddha for
help.
The Buddha preached the dhamma to him and he became a
stream-winner. The old Sakka died and a new Sakka was reborn.
It was lucky of him that the
Buddha was
there to save him. Had it not been for the Buddha, it would have
been a
disaster to the old great god.
Not only old age and dying "...
grief,
suffering, sorrow, despair and lamentation come into being." All
these are
sufferings. "Thus comes to be the origination of this entire mass
of ill."
So, the good life resulting from grasping is dreadful suffering
after all.
Men or gods, all have to suffer.
If the good life resulting from
good deeds
is suffering, had we better not do them? No. If we do not do good
deeds,
bad deeds may come up. These can lead us to hell, to the realm of
animals,
to the realm of ghosts. The sufferings of these lower planes are
far
worse. Human and divine life is suffering compared with the
happiness of
deathless Nirvana but compared with the sufferings of the lower
states,
human or divine life is happiness indeed.
Right grasping gives rise to good
deeds.
Likewise wrong grasping gives rise to bad deeds. Thinking
that it
is good to do so, some kill, steal, rob, do wrong to others. As a
result
they are reborn in bad bourn -- in hell, in the realm of animals,
in the
realm of ghosts. To be reborn in hell is like jumping into a great
fire.
Even a great god can do nothing against hell fire. In the days of
the
Buddha there was a great mara-god by the name of Dusi. He was
contemptuous
of the Buddha and the members of the holy Order. One day he caused
the
death of an arahat. As a result of this cruel deed the great god
died and
was reborn in Avici hell. Once there he was at the mercy of the
guardians
of purgatory. Those people who are bullying others in this world
will meet
the same fate as that met by the great god Dusi one day. Then,
after
suffering for a long time in hell, they will be reborn animals and
ghosts.
So grasping is dreadful. It is
very
important too. We meditate to let this grasping not be, to put an
end to
it. We meditate not to grasp with craving or wrong view, not to
grasp as
permanent or happy, not to grasp as self, ego, the I. Those who
fail to
meditate grasp whenever they see, hear, feel or perceive. Ask
yourselves
if you don't grasp. The answer will be too obvious.
Let's begin with seeing. Suppose
you see
something beautiful. What do you think of it? You are delighted
with it,
pleased with it, aren't you? You won't say, "I don't want to see, I
don't
want to look at it." In fact, you are thinking, "What a beautiful
thing!
How lovely!" Beaming with smiles you are pleased with it. At the
same time
you are thinking it is permanent. Whether the object seen is a
human being
or an inanimate thing, you think it has existed before, exists
now, and
will go on existing for ever. Although it is not your own, you
mentally
take possession of it and delight in it. If it is a piece of
clothing, you
mentally put it on and are pleased. If it is a pair of sandals,
you
mentally put them on. If it is a human being, you mentally use him
or her
and are pleased, too.
The same thing happens when you
hear,
smell, taste or touch. You take pleasure on each occasion. With
thoughts
the range of your delights is far wider. You fancy and take
delight in
things not your own, long for them, and imagine them to be yours.
If they
are your own things, needless to say, you keep thinking of them
and are
pleased with them all the time. We meditate to check such taking
delights
in and graspings. We grasp with wrong views, too. You grasp with
the
personality view. When you see, you think what you see is a
person, an
ego. Your own consciousness of seeing, too, you take as a person,
an ego.
Without a thorough insight knowledge we grasp at things the moment
we see
them. Think of yourselves and you will see for yourselves how you
have got
such grasping in you. You think of yourself as well as of others
as an ego
that has lived the whole life long. In reality there is no such
thing.
Nothing lives the whole life long. Only mind and matter rising one
after
another in continuation. This mind-and-matter you take as person,
ego, and
grasp. We meditate to not let these graspings with wrong views be.
But we have to meditate on things
as they
come up. Only then will we be able to prevent the graspings.
Graspings
come from seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching and
thinking. They
come from six places -- six doors. Can we cling to things we
cannot see?
No. Can we cling to those we cannot hear? No. The Buddha himself
has asked
these questions.
"Now what think you,
Malunkya's son? As to
those shapes cognizable by eye, which you have not seen, which you
have
never seen before, which you do not see now, which you have no
desire to
see in future, -- have you any partiality, any passion, any
affection for
such shapes?"
"Not so, my lord." --
Samyutta Nikaya iv. 72
What are those shapes you have not
seen
before? Towns and villages and countries you have never been to,
men and
women living there, and other scenes. How can anyone fall in love
with men
and women he or she hasn't ever seen? How can you cling to them?
So, you
do not cling to things you have never seen. No defilements arise
in
respect of them. You do not need to meditate on them. But things
you see
are another matter. Defilements can arise -- that is to say, if
you fail
to meditate to prevent them.
The same is true of things heard,
smelled,
tasted, touched, thought on.
-ooOoo-