02/05/2010 10:56 (GMT+7)
One of the functions of the Abhidharma is
definition. Definition is
important because, to successfully communicate about a rather
technical subject, we must
know precisely what our terms mean. Thus I would like to look at a
number of terms used
frequently and popularly in speaking about Buddhist thought. |
02/05/2010 10:55 (GMT+7)
Because of its importance and scope, I will
dedicate three chapters to
the analysis of consciousness within Abhidharma philosophy. In
this chapter I look at some
of the systems for classifying consciousness and also at the
sense-sphere consciousness in
particular. |
02/05/2010 10:55 (GMT+7)
The Abhidharma is supposed to deal with four
ultimate
realities--consciousness (chitta), mental states (chetasika),
matter (rupa), and nirvana.
Matter shares with consciousness and mental states the character
of being a conditioned
reality, whereas nirvana is an unconditioned reality. In
considering the three conditioned
realities, we can simultaneously treat the five aggregates of
psycho-physical existence. |
02/05/2010 10:55 (GMT+7)
Human
personality, according to the Buddhist standpoint, is a composite
of psychical and
physical components (naama-ruupa) and its very nature is
changing and impermanent.
In relation to it the presupposition of I and 'mine' arises. |
02/05/2010 10:54 (GMT+7)
The topic of my Dharma talk today is Buddhist
cosmology, a term which does
not occur in everyday conversation. What then, is cosmology? The
dictionary defines it as
a branch of philosophy dealing with the origin, processes and
structure of the universe. |
02/05/2010 10:54 (GMT+7)
The Suttas indicate physical conditions for success
in meditation,
and also acceptance of
a not-Self tile-principle (primarily vinnana) which is (usually)
dependent on the mortal
physical body. In the Abhidhamma and commentaries, the physical
acts on the mental through
the senses and through the 'basis' for mind-organ and
mind-consciousness, which came to be
seen as the 'heart-basis'. |
02/05/2010 10:53 (GMT+7)
The topic of this panel is "Biotechnology: Boon
or Bane for
Spiritual
Development." It has very often been said that we are on the
threshold of the biotech
century, and I am sure that all of you are very clearly aware that
genetic engineering is
going to totally reshape life on this planet in many ways:
economically, politically,
scientifically--particularly in terms of medicine, and also
environmentally. |
02/05/2010 10:53 (GMT+7)
Buddha taught that
everyone encounters
suffering and disappointment. He also taught that these
dissatisfactions have causes and
that they will be eliminated if their causes are. Although he
recognized that a number of
different factors combine to cause dissatisfaction, he singled out
desire as the principal
cause. |
02/04/2010 23:08 (GMT+7)
Since the
German
philosopher Schleiermacher (1768~1834) Western philosophy has
adopted a distinction between problems of “interpretation” and problems
of
“hermeneutics”. “Interpretation” is the application of rules to an
object (for
example, a text) in order to distinguish wrong from correct
interpretations. |
02/04/2010 23:07 (GMT+7)
This paper is one of the seven chapters in my PhD thesis. There
are three
sections. In the first section, I expound the early Chinese
interpretations of
the two truths, according to chronological order. In the second section,
I
explain the reasons why Chi-tsang establishes the theory of the two
truths. |
17/03/2010 05:50 (GMT+7)
The introduction of the Avatamsaka-sutra into Chinaprovided the scriptural basis for one of the most influentialphilosophies in Chinese (and Japanese) Buddhism, developed byTu-shun, Chih-yen, Fa-tsang, Cheng-kuan, and Tsung-mi, duringthe T'ang dynasty. |
17/03/2010 05:49 (GMT+7)
A philosopher of Buddhism is not tied by the kinds of restrictions thatlimit a Christian or a Hindu philosopher. The Buddha himself encouraged hisfollowers to analyse, exposit and test his teaching in the light ofcontemporary views, techniques and tools. The followers of the Buddha areby no means bound to be faithful to the doctrine, and philosophicalexegesis, exposition and clarification of notions are deemed entirelylaudable. |
11/02/2010 10:31 (GMT+7)
IT
HAS BEEN SAID THAT,
after the Buddha, the single most important figure in the entire
Buddhist tradition was a monk named Acharya Nagarjuna, sometimes called
the Second. Buddha. |
05/02/2010 15:54 (GMT+7)
When we talk about Buddhism as the path with a heart, as I've kindly been
asked to do, the title itself raises some questions. For example, The path with
a heart. Does this imply that other paths don't have a heart? Then there's
path. Is Buddhism a path? And finally, heart. What is the heart of Buddhism? |
05/02/2010 15:49 (GMT+7)
The purpose of meditation is to gain realizations leading to the
cessation
of delusion and superstition. This cessation depends, first of all, on
recognizing the character or function of the deluded mind. In addition,
it is
necessary to understand the various factors causing such a deluded mind
to
arise. |
05/02/2010 15:38 (GMT+7)
We always use the word, "ego." But although we're all the time
saying, "ego, ego, ego," we don't realize the ego's psychological
aspects, its mental attitude. We interpret the ego as some sort of physical
entity. Therefore, it is necessary to discover that the ego is mental, not
physical. That's so worthwhile. |
05/02/2010 15:23 (GMT+7)
Kyabje Ling Rinpoche, the senior tutor of His
Holiness the Dalai Lama, was the 97th holder of the Ganden throne and
thus head
of the Gelug tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. He was ordained by the
Thirteenth
Dalai Lama, to whom his predecessor had also been tutor. This teaching
was
given at Tushita Mahayana Meditation Centre on November 14, 1979. Edited
by
Nicholas Ribush from an oral translation by Lama Gelek Rinpoche. |
05/02/2010 15:18 (GMT+7)
Lama.Thubten.Yeshe.(15.5.1935, 5:00 LMT (6:05 GMT),
Töling Dechen/Lhasa/TIB - 3.3.1984, 5:07 PST, Los Angeles/USA), also called
"Hippie Lama" was one of the most outstanding personalities of the
Seventieth and early Eighties. Beside Chögyam Trungpa he was one of the first
Tibetan teachers, who managed to explain Buddhism in a modern and unorthodox
way. |
05/02/2010 15:05 (GMT+7)
The
Buddha taught so that beings would be happy and satisfied. Having attained the
ultimate happiness of enlightenment himself, out of love and compassion for
each sentient being he wanted to share his experience with them all. But he
could not transplant his realizations into the minds of others, remove their
suffering by hand or wash away their ignorance with water-he could only teach
them to develop their minds for themselves, as he had done. Thus he showed the
path to enlightenment. |
|